Evidence to Answers: Water Heaters

In water-loss claims, the best next step is often the simplest: document thoroughly, then act.

There is only one thing better than running water: hot running water. But only when it stays where it is supposed to.

Water heaters are a common appliance involved in water-loss claims, and they present a recurring challenge for adjusters: the failure point is not always obvious, and critical installation context can be lost quickly once the unit is moved.

In this Evidence to Answers episode, senior forensic engineer Mark breaks down what water heaters are, how they should be installed, how they fail, and what to document before removal so a product and component evaluation has the best chance of reaching a defensible conclusion.

There is only one thing better than running water: hot running water. But only when it stays where it is supposed to.

Water heaters are a common appliance involved in water-loss claims, and they present a recurring challenge for adjusters: the failure point is not always obvious, and critical installation context can be lost quickly once the unit is moved.

In this Evidence to Answers episode, senior forensic engineer Mark breaks down what water heaters are, how they should be installed, how they fail, and what to document before removal so a product and component evaluation has the best chance of reaching a defensible conclusion.

What a water heater is (and what it is supposed to do)

A water heater is an appliance with an energy source, typically gas or electricity, used to heat water for use in residential or commercial structures.

There are two common categories:

  • Traditional tank-style water heaters that heat and store water in a tank.
  • Tankless (on-demand) water heaters that do not store water in a tank.

From a claims perspective, both are frequently encountered when an appliance leaks and causes water damage. Tankless systems can also contribute to elevated humidity and condensation conditions due to continuous hot water availability.

Installation factors that change the story

Manufacturer installation instructions should be followed, as reinforced by commonly used building and plumbing codes.

Key installation details to document on scene before removal:

  • Drainage piping
  • Required clearances
  • Condition and routing of the temperature & pressure (T&P) relief valve and discharge piping
  • Presence and condition of a drain pan (or a suitable drain)
  • Location of a floor drain

What adjusters should document before removal

As with any product-related matter, preserve the backstory and identifiers:

  • Part numbers
  • Manufacturer
  • Approximate age and date of installation
  • Overall condition (photos before removal)
  • Maintenance records
  • Any work performed in proximity to the unit

If subrogation is being considered, confirm applicable timing requirements with counsel (including statute of repose in the relevant jurisdiction).

How water heaters commonly fail

Common failure patterns include:

  • Installation-related issues
    • Improper connection of water lines (including polymer pipe directly at inlet/outlet)
    • Lack of dielectric connections
    • Missing pan or missing / improper T&P piping (removal of a required safety element)
  • Manufacturing or materials issues
    • Improper welds
    • Insufficient bonding of glass lining
  • Maintenance-related conditions
    • Failure to flush and drain annually
    • Failure to inspect the anode
    • Water softener issues that accelerate corrosion (including inappropriate salt addition)
  • Normal wear and tear
    • Component failures (interlocks, sensors) often occur before a tank failure

What an expert looks for during evaluation

Common visual indicators include:

  • Mineral / salt deposits
  • Corrosion
  • Leak indicators

Context matters. Age, install date, maintenance, and usage patterns should be considered. Certain conditions can reduce life expectancy, including recirculation pumps and hydronic heating use.

Evidence quality and next-step testing

In many cases, the leakage point is concealed. The initial exam may identify whether leakage occurred and recommend additional work. Often, a joint destructive exam is needed to classify the failure mode.

Connect

Real People. Real Solutions.

Submit A Forensic Assignment
Submit A General Inquiry

You’re not sending a message into the void - this form routes your inquiry directly to the Forensic Services team.

Thank you! We will get back to you soon.
Oops! Please try submitting the form again.
Experience . . . the difference!
Where can you use our expert advice and solid answers?
Contact Us Today!